Foul Play Essay Research Paper Foul PlayDear free essay sample

Foul Play Essay, Research Paper Foul Play Beloved Members of the Board of the National Collegiate Association of America: Since the beginning of collegial sports, there have been student-athletes whose actions are considered disproportionately aberrant. College jocks have defied the regulations and ordinances set Forth by the National Collegiate Association of America by such Acts of the Apostless as accepting stipends, perpetrating day of the month colza, mistreating drugs, and even perpetrating homicide. For some ground, college jocks believe they are above the jurisprudence and should non hold to stay by the same set of regulations as a normal pupil, because of their athletic endowment. As a former NCAA Division II football participant, I can certify to the feeling jocks have that they deserve particular intervention because of their position. There are some people who believe that college sports is above reproach, but the intent of this essay is to asseverate the statement that college sports is corrupt. We will write a custom essay sample on Foul Play Essay Research Paper Foul PlayDear or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Year after twelvemonth, college jocks make the headlines of newspapers and magazines across the state, non merely for their achievements on the field, but more for their jokes off the field. College jocks sacrifice their organic structures, unity, and character to derive an advantage over their opposition. Athletes give up the really things that make them who they are to experience appreciated by their managers, teammates, and fans. Players cheat by taking anabolic steroids and other banned substances that give them a chemically induced physical advantage ( Eitzen 3 ) . Athletes desire to be identified with a squad that works and sacrifices together to make a common end. The guestion we should inquire ourselves is: Why? Why do persons give up so much to be a portion of a squad? The reply lies within the organisation of how big-time college athletics exists. Fans are drawn to large featuring events such as the Super Bowl and the World Series. College athletes want to be in that limeli ght, and they sacrifice everything to derive that position. Fans are consumed by athleticss. USA Today, the most widely read newspaper in the United States, devotes one-quarter of its infinite to feature ( 14 ) . Fans know every item about their darling athleticss squad. Not merely the latest box tonss, but besides the win-loss record, point spread, current statistics, play-off chances, and biographical information about jocks and managers ( 16 ) . College athleticss entreaty to the general populace, immature and old. At a really immature age, draw a bead oning college jocks are taught the rules of athletics and how much winning truly means. Young jocks are told to sell out every drama, every twenty-four hours, and every manner. One such case involves a football squad composed of fifth-graders, that were shunned upon after losing the title game. At a feast following the season, each participant received a plaque on which was inscribed a quotation mark by Vince Lombardi, the ill-famed manager of the Green Bay Packers: There is no room for 2nd topographic point. I have finished 2nd twice before and I neer want to complete 2nd once more. There is a 2nd topographic point bowl game but it is a game for also-rans played by also-rans. It is and ever has been an American ardor to be foremost in anything we do and to win and to win and to win, ( Klatell, and Marcus 136 ) . Another phrase frequently used to elicit jocks is: Good, Better, Best, neer allow it rest ; until your good is better than best, ( Eitz en 134 ) . This idea procedure which is ingrained into the heads of immature jocks can be really detrimental. Athlet es get down experiencing inferior to teams that win, and will make anything to wipe out the disadvantage. Young athletes believe that they have to be the best, so they have a greater opportunity of becomig a pro. The most tantalising portion of college sports is the temptingness of going a professional jock. More than winning, college jocks are drawn to the large wage contracts of professional athletics. College managers tend to utilize this desire to obtain a greater attempt out of their jocks. For the large money, college jocks will give anything, and take anything to be a professional jock. Often times the jocks are tempted by payoffs, and gifts from alumnas, and crooked athleticss agents to fall in their squad. Coaches sometimes exploit the athletic accomplishments of their participants while non assisting them travel toward graduation ( 95 ) . From every influential angle an jock has, he or she is being taught that cheating is okay to acquire an advantage over an opposition, but the ultimate end is to do it to the pros. Athletes are drawn to the copiousness of money, and all the particular intervention received for being a pro jock. Contrary to my sentiment, Mike Krzyzewski, the extremely ill-famed, extremely publicized, extremely successful manager of the Duke University Blue Devils work forces s hoops squad, states that, All this material where people talk about college athleticss and things as bad, you have no thought. I want to wham everybody who says that. College athleticss are great. They re okay when you yell at each other, when you hug each other, when you live, ( Eitzen 105 ) . Coach K, as he is normally referred to as, believes that these behaviours are committed by bad people, who have lost sight of the true intent of college athletics and allow the chase of winning override the chase of instruction ( 106 ) . Coach K truly loves his participants, managers, the chumminess, and the awards of big-time college sports, but fails to acknowledge the farces and offenses that are overlooked to bring forth such glorifications. Coach K is blind to the fact that college athleticss are corrupt, because he bases his sentiment on his ain perceptual experience, and does non recognize that the false belief lies in the organisation of big-time college athletics. Big-time college athletics contradicts itself in many ways, it provides accomplishment, exhilaration, and exuberation for jocks. As former jock Kenny Moore provinces: To observe athletics is to observe sheer wantonness, to enjoy minutes when jocks surrender themselves to attempt and are truly transformed. This is when athletics takes solitariness, fright, hatred, and self-importance and transmutes them into accomplishment, records, art, and powerful illustration, ( Thelin 55 ) . Moore besides admits college athletics has a dark side as he states: Sports nowadayss us with cocaine deceases, steroid cover-ups, collegiate lip services, chancing dirts, condemnable agents, and Olympic boycotts. Such weaknesss show that athleticss educating, liberating attempt on us in incomplete. Not everyone is following the regulations. Not everyone is seeking, ( 58 ) . In decision, college jocks have been noncompliant of the regulations of the NCAA every bit long as athleticss and the regulation organic structure have existed. Colleges and universities need to look at the policies and beliefs of their establishment sing sports, and if needed brand damagess. The inquiry that should basically be asked is this: What is our mission? Why do we be? Are we here to learn and larn or are we here to house big-time college athletics? ( 203 ) .